Indian, US, and UK law. One reading room.
The answer arrives with its authorities.
The High Counsel reads across two million indexed cases and answers only from what it can cite. Every proposition is pinned to the statute, the paragraph, and the forum that decided it.
Exports to Word, WhatsApp, and Clio.
The night docket
Three jurisdictions, read to the paragraph.
These are the pins The High Counsel produces. Not a summary of the area. The specific authority, at the specific place, from the forum that decided it.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
(2017) 10 SCC 1
Privacy held intrinsic to Article 21. The proportionality test as the plurality framed it.
Pin: para 297, plurality opinion
Supreme Court of India
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993)
Rule 702 makes the trial judge the gatekeeper for expert testimony.
Pin: 509 U.S. at 597
Supreme Court of the United States
Arnold v Britton
[2015] UKSC 36
Interpretation begins with the language the parties actually chose.
Pin: para 17, Lord Neuberger PSC
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
The record
Numbers you can put to a client.
2M+
Cases indexed and searchable today
20M
The corpus we are building toward
3
Pins on every citation: statute, paragraph, forum
0
Propositions allowed without a real authority behind them
The method
How a matter moves through The High Counsel.
Ask the way you brief a junior
Plain language, real stakes. Interim relief under Section 9, limitation under Article 137, forum for a cross-border claim. No query syntax to learn.
Read the authorities, not about them
The High Counsel builds its answer from the cases themselves. Each proposition carries its pin, so you move from the answer to the paragraph in one step.
Verify before you rely
If the authority does not exist, the sentence does not get written. Where benches differ, the answer says so and shows you both lines.
Take it to work
Send the research memo to Word for the brief, to WhatsApp for the client who wanted it an hour ago, and to Clio for the matter file.
I asked for the current position on Section 34 interference with arbitral awards. It gave me the cases, the paragraphs, and where the benches differ. That last part is the work I usually do at midnight.
Senior Advocate, Delhi High Court
Pragmatis Law
The reading room is open.
Start with your next matter. If a citation does not hold, you will know before the bench does.